banking services chronicle contact number

banking services chronicle contact number

banking services chronicle contact number  Published this article page no   Blaming guns is the simple and lazy response to crime in the United States. Unsurprisingly it is also wrong. Statistics from the National Federation of State High School Associations reveal that in 1999 15 students perished while playing in high school football games. This fact received little to no coverage in the national media. Angry parents did not parade into Washington D.C. in order to demand stricter regulation of high school football. Politicos feigning intense anguish did not bemoan footballs domination of most learning institutions sports programs. The large majority of this countrys citizens watched their favorite high school football teams oblivious to the blood that soaked the pigskin and dripped onto Americas playing fields. Conversely when 15 students died from gunshot wounds during the 19981999 school year as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate the national media evangelized endlessly about the evils of guns. Apparently forgetting that many of the kid killers such as Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold had obtained their weapons illegally hordes of crusaders seethed that if guns werent legal and available the school murders wouldnt have happened. A few local governments hoping to score political points filed lawsuits against gun manufacturers blaming them for the orgy of death and violence that seemed to have consumed Americas school system. Why did 15 deaths related to high school football inspire scant attention while 15 deaths resulting from gun violence kindled nationwide apoplexy Many rightwingers would simply answer Because the gun grabbers want to seize our weapons they will ignore any fact that stands in their way These conservatives believe leftists across America want to confiscate firearms for the sole purpose of extending government control over the citizenry. But really the notion that an enormous conspiracy in which common liberals from all regions of the country participate exists to subjugate the American people is patently absurd. Most Americans care too little about politics and government to sustain such a farreaching plot. Instead the average gun control advocate honestly does believe that laws tightly regulating firearms if not outright banning them would reduce the number of Americans who die as a consequence of criminal attacks. Gun control advocates amongst the populace acquire their ideas about firearms from news personalities and government officials who use guns as convenient scapegoats for this countrys high crime rate in order to avoid having to search for genuine causes and solutions. Whenever an event such as a school shooting occurs the personalities and officials shamelessly exploit the opportunity to vilify guns and the individuals who own them. The real interest here is not to save lives but to exacerbate public opinion against guns. That is why the whole world mourned the tragic deaths of 15 students from gunshot wounds during the 19981999 school year but few people if anyone seemed to care that 15 high school football players died in 1999. The truth about guns is that they save far more lives than they take. According to the Fall 1995 issue of The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology lawabiding citizens use guns to defend themselves an average of 2.5 million times per year and only in less than 8 percent of these occurrences will citizens actually need to fire their guns because most criminals will flee at the sight of a firearm. Of the 2.5 million annual instances of selfdefense 200000 are cases of women defending themselves from sexual abuse. In contrast accidental deaths suicides and homicides involving guns number on average less than 40000 every year. This means that American citizens usually employ guns to defend themselves over 60 percent more times yearly than they do to kill intentionally or otherwise. According to the August 28 1996 issue of The Wall Street Journal states with looser gun control laws experience less crime than states with tougher laws. For example in states that had begun to permit concealed weapons in the early 90s the murder rates fell by an average of 8.5 percent the rape rates by 5 percent the aggravated assault rates by 7 percent and the robbery rates by 3 percent. Extrapolating from these data if states that forbade concealed weapons instead allowed them 1570 murders 4177 rapes 60000 aggravated assaults and 11000 robberies annually would not have taken place. The story of Australia demonstrates what could happen in the United States if the American government were to ban guns. After a nut conducted a particularly brutal massacre in the mid90s Australia enacted laws disallowing personal firearms. By the end of 1997 according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics crime had increased. The homicide rate rose by 3.2 percent the assault rate by 8.6 percent the armed robbery rate by 44 percent the unarmed robbery rate by 21 percent the unlawful entry rate by 3.9 percent and the car theft rate by 6.1 percent. Even supposing that Australias new gun laws did not directly cause the increase in crime the laws certainly did nothing to help matters. Because guns are not the forces for evil the media and the government claim they are no reason exists to forbid or to constrict the right to bear arms for lawabiding American citizens. Restrictions of freedom are only necessary and proper when their design is to prevent individuals from harming other people which outlawing guns would not accomplish. Indeed all the criminalization of guns would do is leave the average American defenseless against murderers and thieves who would retain their own guns in natural contrivance of the law. Rather than inhibiting freedom the United States should err on the side of liberty as per the Constitution and allow its citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights as they have over the first 200 years of American history. Contrary to the notion that the Second Amendment does not grant individuals the right to bear arms the Supreme Court ruled in its 1990 decision U.S. v. VerdugoUrquidez that the Second Amendment applies to persons who are a part of a national community. As Thomas Jefferson one of the most intelligent Founding Fathers said I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. banking services chronicle contact number

banking services chronicle contact number